On 8/31/16, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le quintidi 15 fructidor, an CCXXIV, Paul B Mahol a ecrit : >> Yes, it is very simple. You just need to allocate own buffers that >> would be needed >> by filter. Than you just call ctx->internal->execute()... > > I am sorry, but with the current API, to have something that really works > with threads, not just pseudo-threading that is so full of blocking that it > is mostly sequential, it is much more complicated than that. I think. > Please prove me wrong.
How would one use already available workers from lavfi/pthread.c ? If somebody wrote better implementation than me and its faster I will drop mine. > >> Does this fixes buffer queue overflow for specific scenarios? > > Not by itself, but then rewriting framesync to use the link's fifo becomes > very easy and fix all the cases that can possibly work. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
