On 6/16/2016 12:27 AM, compn wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:21:28 -0300 > James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... > > you are aware that we have voted in a code of conduct.[1] > > you may want to review it, again. > > https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Code-of-conduct > > calling developers names will not be tolerated.
I made a list of what you can expect from any kind of exchange with him to save both people's time and sanity, and even linked to a very recent example of this kind of behavior to show I'm not just making things up. I don't think i called him names but if you think i did and violated the CoC then you're welcome to call a vote for whatever action you think should be taken. This entire situation is so distorted and derailed among other things by what i denounced and warned about that at this point i don't know what to expect of it. Or rather, i know i shouldn't expect any concrete and logic action whatsoever being taken at all. > > -compn > > [1] http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-May/194529.html > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
