On Thu, 12 May 2016 11:20:28 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le quartidi 24 floréal, an CCXXIV, Paul B Mahol a écrit : > > Yes. I object its name. Null name is misleading. Its name should be copy. > > I can live with that if other people agree, but for now we have null and > anull in libavfilter, that would be inconsistent. Plus, the filter does not > copy the packet, it just passes it without any filtering. Therefore, unless > you have support on your side, I intend to keep the name. > > Regards, > Conceptually, passing the packets just along is equivalent to copying. It's how refcounting works; without a real copy, the first write access to the packet will do the real copy. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
