On 5/12/16, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le decadi 10 floreal, an CCXXIV, Nicolas George a ecrit : >> From 9507a24a4774dc7542e6cd9739104bb7d9528185 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> >> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:25:37 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] lavc/bsf: add a null bitstream filter. >> >> It passes packets unchanged with a very low overhead. >> Using it allows to have the same code path when bitstream filtering >> is not used, making the code simpler and avoiding bitroting. >> The filter can not be disabled so that applications can rely on it. >> It is added out of alphabetical order to keep the regularity. > > Does someone object to the patch as it is? If not, I intend to push 1/3 and > 2/3 soon.
Yes. I object its name. Null name is misleading. Its name should be copy. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
