Am 28.03.16 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Niedermayer: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:34:05PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 at 11:58 Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> >> Let's compare this to the VLC code of conduct: >> https://wiki.videolan.org/Code_of_Conduct/ >> >> Note how it has a list of specific violations, instead of vague things like >> "Be excellent" that the FFmpeg one has. >> Note how it has a huge section on disciplinary procedures. > > i dont mind at all to be more specific, do people want a more specific > list similar to vlc ? > I thought it wasnt neccessary to write it as a strict "law" as if > theres a nation of criminals that needs precissely worded laws. > But rather a nation of good meaning people who all want to work > together.
I think a more precise law-like definition is not needed. However, listing disciplinary procedures will become very useful if we ever have to enforce anything. > the "Be excellent" text is identical to the linux kernel code of > conflict. > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/Documentation/CodeOfConflict > > >> Note that this CoC should according to FFmpeg "rules" go through a vote, > > If there is no unanimous agreement then we should vote, yes. > If there is unanimous agreement and noone asks for a vote then iam > not sure, it might be better to vote anyway so everyone has a chance > to equally state if they approve or disapprove Let's do a vote. Otherwise this whole thing will become questionable if we ever have to act upon it. -Thilo _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
