On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:38:52PM +0100, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Am 14.03.16 um 13:56 schrieb Clément Bœsch:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> >> Am 14.03.16 um 11:22 schrieb Clément Bœsch:
> >>> [...]
> >>>> +./ffmpeg -f lavfi -i 
> >>>> nullsrc=s=100x100,coreimage=filter=CIQRCodeGenerator@@inputMessage=https\\\\\://FFmpeg.org/@@inputCorrectionLevel=H
> >>>>  -frames:v 1 QRCode.png
> >>>
> >>> remove ./
> >>>
> >>> also, it's probably better to have 2 filters: one for usage as a source,
> >>> and another one for filtering (coreimagesrc vs coreimage).
> >>
> >> I want to extend it later to allow the user to define an output size 
> >> avoiding
> >> the need to have it defined by input iamge size. Then it could be used as 
> >> an
> >> image source, too. However, I'll have to think about many more cases for 
> >> that to
> >> work good. Thus I really want to do it as further work.
> >>
> >> Also, if we split out the generator category into coreimagesrc, the 
> >> following
> >> would not work anymore without GPU-HOST transfer:
> >>
> >> coreimage=filter=boxblur@default#qrcode@whatever@somewhere
> >>
> >> Instead the user would have to use a complex filter:
> >>
> >> coreimagesrc=filter=qrcode@whatever [qr],
> >> [v:0] coreimage=filter=boxblur@default [blur],
> >> [blur][qr]overlay=somewhere [output]
> >>
> >> To do it without transfer then would require to allow coreimage to do 
> >> generators
> >> like coreimagesrc - which would void the argument for a seperated src 
> >> because
> >> complete feature duplication, don't you think?
> >>
> > 
> > If you can hold the picture into a CVPixelBuffer, you could use
> > AV_PIX_FMT_VIDEOTOOLBOX, which make it possible to create one single
> > apple filter per coreimage instance in the filtergraph.
> > 
> > It's probably a cleaner design. You'll probably need a
> > AV_PIX_FMT_VIDEOTOOLBOX to AV_PIX_FMT_RGBA (or whatever) convert filter
> > (transparently in vf scale, or maybe simply a coreimage=torgba)
> 
> Spec says: "A Core Video pixel buffer is an image buffer that holds pixels in
> main memory." A more valid choice could be CVImageBuffer.
> 

You'll need a new pixel format then probably, but this makes me wonder why
we are casting CVImageBufferRef into CVPixelBufferRef in
lavc/videotoolbox...

> Anyway, the object itself should be retainable across filter instances, also 
> as
> a CIImage object. The filter would also have to know about the complete filter
> chain to know if the image should be kept as CIImage object (probably in VRAM)
> for further processing or if it has to be transferred to the host... and where
> in the chain is the current instance? Did it correctly retain an image for 
> this
> instance? What if an error occurs in between? Do we know that?
> 
> There is just missing some work for making a nullsrc in before avoidable. The
> alternative might bring object conversion (PIX_FMT & toRGB filters?), much 
> more
> complex code and filter graph parsing together with a distinct modularization
> with almost the same code. I see this much more error prone and way harder to
> debug and maintain. Once the user can specify an output size the existing code
> would already perfectly serve as an image source.
> 

The filter negotiation is already present in lavfi which should already be
capable of inserting a scaling (convert) filter automatically where it
matters.

An AV_PIX_FMT_VIDEOTOOLBOX is simply a frame with data[3]=CVPixelBufferRef
so you can transmit them between filter instances. They are refcounted so
properly wrapped in AVFrame (see ff_videotoolbox_buffer_create())

> Sorry, I don't think it would be the better choice.
> 
> 
> >>>> +#define SafeCFRelease(ptr) { \
> >>>> +    if (ptr) {               \
> >>>> +        CFRelease(ptr);      \
> >>>> +        ptr = NULL;          \
> >>>> +    }                        \
> >>>> +}
> >>>
> >>> please use do while(0) form
> >>
> >> I don't understand how do while(0) form could be applied here, please 
> >> explain.
> >>
> > 
> > #define SafeCFRelease(ptr) do { \
> >     if (ptr) {                  \
> >         CFRelease(ptr);         \
> >         ptr = NULL;             \
> >     }                           \
> > } while (0)
> 
> I don't know why this is beneficial but I'll change it locally.
> 

So
  if (x)
      SafeCFRelease(a);
  else
      SafeCFRelease(b);

can work.


-- 
Clément B.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to