On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Mats Peterson <matsp888-at-yahoo....@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > +++ tests/data/fate/ffmpeg-filter_colorkey 2016-01-23 > 07:22:58.904430959 +0100 > @@ -1,16 +0,0 @@ > -#tb 0: 1/25 > -#tb 1: 1/48000 > -0, 0, 0, 1, 622080, 0x4e30accb > -1, 0, 0, 1152, 4608, 0x00000000 > -1, 1152, 1152, 1152, 4608, 0xbca29063 > -0, 1, 1, 1, 622080, 0x7d941c14 > -1, 2304, 2304, 1152, 4608, 0x6e70df10 > -1, 3456, 3456, 1152, 4608, 0x95e6a535 > -0, 2, 2, 1, 622080, 0xf7451c5b > -0, 3, 3, 1, 622080, 0xb2c74319 > -0, 4, 4, 1, 622080, 0xc9b80b79 > -0, 5, 5, 1, 622080, 0x92ce1194 > -0, 6, 6, 1, 622080, 0x43ae99ac > -0, 7, 7, 1, 622080, 0x4ec3a554 > -0, 8, 8, 1, 622080, 0x3200250c > -0, 9, 9, 1, 622080, 0x94ebb3f3 > Test ffmpeg-filter_colorkey failed. Look at > tests/data/fate/ffmpeg-filter_colorkey.err for details.
I was also not too happy with the message in the cvslog at a glance, but let it slide as FATE still passed on my configs. The problem is that it is very sensitive to libm differences, e.g the quality of the sqrt. For example, I wanted to experiment with replacing sqrt by sqrtf in lavfi/vf_colorkey, but it breaks the test on my machine. > > Mats > > -- > Mats Peterson > http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
