On 11/28/2015 9:19 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > I actually prefer keeping all at i % 4, since that conveys intent > better IMHO, and would change uniformly to that. It takes a reader a > couple of seconds extra to register what i & 3 is doing for no gain in > C code. No compiler I know of in 2015 has issues with such > trivialities.
Changing all of them sounds fine to me. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel