On 11/28/2015 9:19 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> I actually prefer keeping all at i % 4, since that conveys intent
> better IMHO, and would change uniformly to that. It takes a reader a
> couple of seconds extra to register what i & 3 is doing for no gain in
> C code. No compiler I know of in 2015 has issues with such
> trivialities.

Changing all of them sounds fine to me.

- Derek
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to