On 11/28/2015 7:51 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > In principle of course, e.g with more ifdefry, configure, or something > of that sort. I do not believe this is what he meant.
I will await his reply to clarify, then. Perhaps do not write so matter-of-factly. > In any case, the point is moot - the implementations are not broken - > if they are, avutil/libm needs fixing as well. Now, yes. It would certainly be nice if this was noted somewhere in the patch notes (not necessarily in the commit messages). There are quite a few threads on the list from you now regarding tablegen, and it can be a pain in the butt / tedious to figure out how the current version differs from the N others. >> Anyway, shouldn't this patce dropped, since >> 79abf2d0ded860acf505de22c4f7a750e5e98446 >> removed hardcoded tables anyway? > > No, if you actually read even the first line of the commit message, > you can see it was only for aac, not for this patch series. Indeed, I misread, and missed the 'aac_'. You could certainly be less of an ass about it, though. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
