On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:31 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:05:28 -0400 > Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> More generally, how is this problem "easy to verify"? It may be >> included indirectly, etc. Since you seem to think it is easy, go ahead > > Indirect inclusion is IMHO not fine for such compat headers which > define standard functions on systems where they're missing. And direct > inclusion is easy to verify. > > Nobody expects that you think of everything, but here you ignored a > direct request from a reviewer. > >> >> If FFmpeg waited until verification on every single config was done, >> we would be nowhere. You may think it is not cool, I could say the >> same about many things you have posted on this mailing list as well. > > Strange that you're so awfully pedantic about C standard conformance > (so that we need dozens of patches to fix what doesn't need to be > fixed),
I do not need to address your beliefs, but I do need to address outright falsehood. I normally do not address such things, but things have gone out of hand. I am tired of this, and want it on the public record the actual state of affairs. I did not even submit "dozens" of patches for C standard conformance. There was a 5-patch series for this, all available on ffmpeg-devel for those interested. Even with the 5 patches, I was clear that I am ready to drop immediately since after all they are "pedantic": https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2015-October/181972.html I knew they would likely not get much traction, and would likely be ridiculed for fixing problems that don't need fixing. I never imagined it being used in sarcasm to attack another action I took regarding FFmpeg. > but when it gets annoying for you, suddenly pushing and waiting > until it breaks is fine. How does this even make sense? > >> If Michael thought this was not cool, I will immediately take action. > > Hendrik's voice counts as much as Michael's. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
