On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc >> wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:19:59AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> > This is more concise and conveys the intent better. >> > Furthermore, it is likely more precise as well due to lack of floating >> > point division. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> >> patchset tested on linux32, inux64, mingw32, ming64, qemu-mips and >> qemu-arm >> fate passes on all, i could test on actual arm&mips hw if people think >> that is needed > > > I don't think that's needed. > > Is there some way we can confirm that each of these files that is changed > includes libavutil/libm.h for the compatibility macros in case they're > lacking on the target system?
pushed as is; we have until the next release or a FATE failure to check the build on such obscure configurations. I will try to keep an eye out, but please report if you find failures. > > Ronald > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
