On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:52:40AM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > Hi, > > 2015-10-08 1:38 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>: > >> So I have made a fate test on 1 frame for each sequence (total around > >> 1.8MB). > >> > >> Is it ok? > > > > ok > > Here you go. Hendrik has kindly volunteered to upload the 2 samples for me. > > -- > Christophe
> Makefile | 1 +
> fate/dnxhd.mak | 8 ++++++++
> ref/fate/dnxhd-mbaff | 2 ++
> ref/fate/dnxhr-444 | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> dba9766a9100350ee166c78ca4cdd6249bb0b526 0001-fate-add-DNxHD-HR-tests.patch
> From 332b92d977ae04db0080973426ddc019d93a040b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisq...@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:37:38 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] fate: add DNxHD/HR tests
>
> Currently only 2 profiles are evaluated because they are the only 2
> with distributed test sequences.
> - CID 1260: YUV 4:2:2 10 bits with block-adaptive interlace coding,
> from ticket 4876;
> - CID 1270: YUV 4:4:4 10 bits (HR), 1920x839, from ticket 4581.
>
> They were generated from the ticket sequences by running the
> following kind of command-line;
> ffmpeg -i $INPUT -an -sn -vcodec copy -vframes 1 -y $OUTPUT.mov
applied
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
