On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:06:41PM +0200, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote:
> > is there any reason why this doesnt use
> > libavutil/tree.* ?
> 
> Two reasons basically.
> 
> First, the glue code required to use a generic tree implementation
> instead of one customized for this use case would be as large as the
> implementation of the tree itself.
> 

> Second, my intention is to port it back to x264 at some point so I
> don't want to rely too much on libavutil features unless there's a
> large benefit of doing so.

ahh, ok, no objection from me then

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend
to be. -- Socrates

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to