On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > is there any reason why this doesnt use > libavutil/tree.* ?
Two reasons basically. First, the glue code required to use a generic tree implementation instead of one customized for this use case would be as large as the implementation of the tree itself. Second, my intention is to port it back to x264 at some point so I don't want to rely too much on libavutil features unless there's a large benefit of doing so. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel