> > > > And again, the more important aspect here is that Kieran was *asking*, > not > > publishing, what *business*, not person, sits at a given already > published > > The litteral text from kieran was > > "Who does this address belong to?" > and "who" normally implies a person. > > All above said, if the CC refuses to act on this, obviously that proofs my > point > which was that "the CC is not acting on this". May that be, because the > data was > there in form of a question, or it was a too long ago, or whatever. > > While there seem to be action in other cases of doxxing. >
"Who" can apply to a company in English. To use Grok's explanation: ""Who" in English is traditionally used for people, but in modern usage—especially in questions about ownership, registration, or association—it is commonly extended to organizations, businesses, or legal entities." Kieran > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
