Le keskiviikkona 29. lokakuuta 2025, 22.38.17 Itä-Euroopan normaaliaika Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : > > When did that happen? > > Wed, 31 Jan 2024
I can't find it any match in the archives. Besides, that was during the previous CC and that CC (of which you were a member and I was not) found no issues. I fail to see any sane reason to bring this up again now. > > Doxxing is the publication of personal info against that person's will - > > not quoting some already public info. I seem to recall Kieran *asking* > > what actual business stood at a postal address published by NAB (or was > > it IBC?) under the name of "FFmpeg". > doxxing is about identifying a specific person and exposing or amplifying > info in a way that foreseeably invites harassment or harm. No, that's not what doxxing is. At least according to the wiktionary it is either one of: - To publish personal information of a person without their consent. - To reveal the operator of an anonymous online account without their consent. Quoting an already already published public info is not publishing, and more importantly, "FFmpeg" is not a person. Kieran did not doxx Thilo. This has been explained to you several times. I don't need to remind you that continuing to spread those accusations could be construed as libel. At least, they validate Vittorio's recent claims that you are carrying a personal vendetta against Kieran. > Even a public work address can fit this Obviously not. If it is already public then by definition it cannot be doxxing. And again, the more important aspect here is that Kieran was *asking*, not publishing, what *business*, not person, sits at a given already published postal address - for the legitimate purpose of identifying who paid for a booth in the name of "FFmpeg". > Especially with hostile framing. Maybe hostile framing is aggravating circumstances for doxxing. But since there was no doxxing in the first place, the matter of aggravating circumstances is moot. FWIW, this is also unprovable if the original emails have been deleted. > > As for Kieran's quote, Thilo is welcome to thank Kieran for the notice and > > complain to the conference organisation for their lackluster privacy. > Kieran posted the address in public. That was not neccessary to inform Thilo > about it The question was very relevant to FFmpeg-devel, so of course it was raised here. If Thilo subsequently outed himself, that is a proverbial own-goal. If someone else outed Thilo, then they are the one(s) having potentially doxxed Thilo. And BTW, your action on Sundays caused people to believe that I was running the Twitter account. In turn it led actually me being attacked and defamed on social media. Indeed, it was completely illogical to vote against the media team delegation as a retaliatory action against me, whom you knew was never part of that team. Did I accuse you of doxxing by omission or implication? I did not and I will not. -- ヅニ-クーモン・レミ Suomen Uusimaa _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
