On 8/3/2025 9:02 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi

On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 05:31:39PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
[...]
The solutions are obvious:
1. ignore security and supply chain attacks
2. use merges not rebases on the server
3. rebase locally, use fast forward only
4. verify on server rebases

Maybe not everyone understood the problem. So let me try a different
explanation. Without any signatures.

In the ML workflow: (for simplicity we assume reviewer and commiter is the same 
person)
1. someone posts a patch
2. patch is locally applied or rebased
3. commit is reviewed
4. commit is tested
5. commit is pushed

Here the only way to get bad code in, is through the reviewer
If the reviewer doesnt miss anything and his setup is not compromised
then what he pushes is teh reviewed code

if its manipulated after its pushed git should light up like a christmess tree
on the next "git pull --rebase"


With the rebase on webapp (gitlab or forgejo) workflow
1. someone posts a pull request
2. pr is reviewed
3. pr is approved
4. pr is rebased
5. pr is tested
6, pr is pushed

now here of course the same reviewer trust or compromised scenarios exist
but we also have an extra one and that is the server
because the server strips the signatures during rebase it can modify the
commit. And this happens after review and because a rebase was litterally
requested by the reviewer its not likely to be noticed as something out of
place
If you as a pusher of commits want to sign them with your own key, you have to do that manually.
There is no sane way for Forgjo to do that for you.

I can configure Forgejo to sign commits it itself generates, that is an option. See here for how it can do it on merges.
https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/admin/advanced/signing/#pull-request-merges

I think if I set it to "commitssigned", it'll check all commits in the PR against the users configured GPG/SSH key, and if they are all valid, it'll then sign them with the instance key whenever it needs to modify them for an operation. "twofa" would also be an option, cause it indicates that the author of that commit has some reasonably strong proof that they are them themselves.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to