Lynne (HE12025-06-04): > You don't get to say "oh, there were no more objections, so it was fine" or > "the use is evident" after the mess that your original patchsets were. > > You're still not using the native time fields, nor the packet buffers, which > is a very hard NAK from me.
Indeed. And not just that. The whole series had many deep logic flaws that made it a dead end without a complete rewrite. I explained at the time, and “softworkz” was almost as rude then than they are now. My patience if more than exhausted, I will not explain again. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
