The first sentence was unnecessary. No need to be this aggressive.

On 6/3/2025 1:00 PM, Lynne wrote:
You don't get to say "oh, there were no more objections, so it was fine" or "the use is evident" after the mess that your original patchsets were.

You're still not using the native time fields, nor the packet buffers, which is a very hard NAK from me.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to