Hi,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025, 09:52 Sean McGovern <gsean...@gmail.com> wrote: > It was left unreferenced in 1f0948272a0fcd0e4947f629b600983f3338c02f. > --- > libpostproc/postprocess.h | 2 ++ > libpostproc/version.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/libpostproc/postprocess.h b/libpostproc/postprocess.h > index 5decb7e8a9..7010c2b51b 100644 > --- a/libpostproc/postprocess.h > +++ b/libpostproc/postprocess.h > @@ -87,7 +87,9 @@ void pp_free_context(pp_context *ppContext); > > #define PP_CPU_CAPS_MMX 0x80000000 > #define PP_CPU_CAPS_MMX2 0x20000000 > +#if PP_AMD_3DNOW > #define PP_CPU_CAPS_3DNOW 0x40000000 > +#endif > #define PP_CPU_CAPS_ALTIVEC 0x10000000 > #define PP_CPU_CAPS_AUTO 0x00080000 > > diff --git a/libpostproc/version.h b/libpostproc/version.h > index bcbdd210c4..5a272630bf 100644 > --- a/libpostproc/version.h > +++ b/libpostproc/version.h > @@ -43,4 +43,6 @@ > > #define LIBPOSTPROC_IDENT "postproc" > AV_STRINGIFY(LIBPOSTPROC_VERSION) > > +#define PP_AMD_3DNOW (LIBPOSTPROC_VERSION_MAJOR < 60) > + > #endif /* POSTPROC_VERSION_H */ > -- > 2.39.5 > Did I do this correctly this time? Also it seems a bit much to wait a year or more for this to be actually removed. Can it instead be keyed to the next minor bump, or is this against some guarantee we give our downstreams? -- Sean McGovern > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
