On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 03:10:40PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Michael Niedermayer > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 02:28:07PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > >> This fixes a -Wabsolute-value reported by clang 3.5+ complaining about > >> misuse of fabs() for integer absolute value. > >> An additional benefit is the removal of floating point calculations. > >> Note that the behaviors are not exactly identical, but should be ok in > >> most situations. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> libswresample/dither.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/libswresample/dither.c b/libswresample/dither.c > >> index 248062a..fc08932 100644 > >> --- a/libswresample/dither.c > >> +++ b/libswresample/dither.c > >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ av_cold int swri_dither_init(SwrContext *s, enum > >> AVSampleFormat out_fmt, enum AV > >> memset(s->dither.ns_errors, 0, sizeof(s->dither.ns_errors)); > >> for (i=0; filters[i].coefs; i++) { > >> const filter_t *f = &filters[i]; > >> - if (fabs(s->out_sample_rate - f->rate) / f->rate <= .05 && > >> f->name == s->dither.method) { > >> + if ((abs(s->out_sample_rate - f->rate) <= f->rate / 20) && > >> f->name == s->dither.method) { > > > > unneeded () and the identical condition should be used if possible > > Thanks for pointing this out, will change. > > > > > something like > > llabs(s->out_sample_rate - f->rate) * 20 <= f->rate > > I initially thought of this approach, but went with my current patch > because I was afraid of overflow with abs(). > llabs() is a good clean solution, but is it available on all platforms?
you can use FFABS() with 64bit arguments [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel