On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Michael Niedermayer
<mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 02:28:07PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> This fixes a -Wabsolute-value reported by clang 3.5+ complaining about
>> misuse of fabs() for integer absolute value.
>> An additional benefit is the removal of floating point calculations.
>> Note that the behaviors are not exactly identical, but should be ok in most
>> situations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> libswresample/dither.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libswresample/dither.c b/libswresample/dither.c
>> index 248062a..fc08932 100644
>> --- a/libswresample/dither.c
>> +++ b/libswresample/dither.c
>> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ av_cold int swri_dither_init(SwrContext *s, enum
>> AVSampleFormat out_fmt, enum AV
>> memset(s->dither.ns_errors, 0, sizeof(s->dither.ns_errors));
>> for (i=0; filters[i].coefs; i++) {
>> const filter_t *f = &filters[i];
>> - if (fabs(s->out_sample_rate - f->rate) / f->rate <= .05 && f->name
>> == s->dither.method) {
>> + if ((abs(s->out_sample_rate - f->rate) <= f->rate / 20) && f->name
>> == s->dither.method) {
>
> unneeded () and the identical condition should be used if possible
Thanks for pointing this out, will change.
>
> something like
> llabs(s->out_sample_rate - f->rate) * 20 <= f->rate
I initially thought of this approach, but went with my current patch
because I was afraid of overflow with abs().
llabs() is a good clean solution, but is it available on all platforms?
As per the documentation, it is C99 which is in general not safe to use.
I notice one use in entire codebase (line 515 of avformat/dump.c), so
it should be ok in my view.
I will resend the patch only after someone confirms the safety of
llabs on all platforms.
>
> [...]
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> What does censorship reveal? It reveals fear. -- Julian Assange
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
