Hi devs, I'm been following the discussion but not taking part on it. I've just created a WIP PR on the forgejo instance which I'd like to get review, in case the instance is ready for the experiment.
Please let me know if you prefer that I send the changes via the mailing list instead, in case the experiment has not yet started. (Please also let me know if I should start a new thread for it, as I still feel a bit confused by it). Here is the link for the PR: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/10 Cheers, Leandro On 2/12/25 21:38, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:49:20PM +0100, Lynne wrote: >> On 12/02/2025 19:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> I propose, that we enable github pull requests >>> >>> github is the most widely used development platform and has the lowest >>> barrier >>> of entry. >>> >>> after ~1-3 Month, we then evaluate how many new developers this attracted, >>> how many new contributions it attracted. >>> What the ratios of reviewed vs ignored vs applied vs rejected patches are >>> compared to the ML >> Those are rather arbitrary statistics. > Some people claimed these statistics would improve. I do think we should > compare some statistics (obviously not limited to these) > > > [...] > >> Users can already login to the instance with their github accounts, so >> there's no barrier to entry. > Thats cool, then forgejo is probably better for this experiment (if we do it) > > thx > > > [...] > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
