On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 1:12 PM Devin Heitmueller < devin.heitmuel...@ltnglobal.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 3:00 PM Pavel Koshevoy <pkoshe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > yes, that patch is better in that it doesn't over-allocate. > > I don't care much which fix gets merged, so long as the problem is fixed. > > Ok, if you could please try that patch and assuming it works for you > reply to the list accordingly. I tried it two years ago (which is how > I found a bug in it), but it would be good to have someone else test > it before it gets merged. I've submitted a 3rd version of the patch that doesn't do as much over-allocation, similar to https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-June/310456.html My v3 patch works correctly with the 2 sample files I can test with. Pavel. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
