Hi Kieran On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 02:44:03PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > Don't assume he will not extend the implementation. Ask him instead what > > he plans to do in the long term. > > And this could also be marked as experimental, in which case if > > abandoned or proven unstable for several real world cases, it can be > > removed or disabled. >
> "the most simple and elegant solution is usually the best" suggests > that this isn't going to be improved. one developer said one thing, and you conclude that he meant something else and in the next step that everyone else also meant that. sure, thats solid reasoning! Lets build our project decissions on top of that. > FEC requires tons of heuristics to work in the real world. Besides your word, is there some evidence ? (and the question is not that YOUR implementation needs "tons of heuristics to work in the real world." or the reference does but that EVERY implementation does) You seem to claim that mpeg FEC cannot be implemented cleanly [...] thx -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
