This makes sense to me now. I think it makes more sense to follow the A53 approach and be consistent.
May I suggest the following in the patch to also improve readability in this crowded area of code: - SCTE-20 section: as you are declaring `cap` to be `s1->a53_buf_ref->data + old_size` now, the memset immediately following the declaration can be shortened to `memset(cap, 0, cc_count * 3);` - DVB 0502 section: rename `uint8_t* data` to `uint8_t *cap` when you are setting up the final payload. This makes it more consistent with the other sections. In the meantime I will test locally and await other feedback. Thank you very much. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
