On 22 Nov 2024, at 13:38, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> I do not accept this warning, and I do not agree with your reasoning. > > The entire point of that thread was paid work, and cost matters. I worded > in an entirelty legitimate way. > > The fact that all the BS that has happened on this list since and *this* > is the result is, for lack of a better work, complete bullshit. > > The CC is a lame duck. > > - Derek > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:18:04 -0500 > From: Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > To: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> > CC: c...@ffmpeg.org > > > > Hi Derek, > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 11:04 AM Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com > <mailto:derek.buitenh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > This work was very easy and not worth even remotely close to 5K euro. > > > This comment ("This work is not worth XYZ") was unnecessarily provocative. > Please consider stating something as subjective as this as an opinion instead > of an assertion - like you did further on in this thread. > > Thank you, > the CC [Steven, James, JB, Ronald - with Michael abstaining & not > participating] While I might not in principle disagree with the CCs action here, the (at least perceived) inaction of the CC in other cases makes this seem the CC has a huge double standard how to deal with things… (Or there is a big communication/transparency problem.) > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
