Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc
> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:48:07AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> <mich...@niedermayer.cc
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:45:55PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> > > > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 16.08.2015 22:15, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > > > > Convert last users to av_opt_get_*() counterparts.
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > libavfilter/af_aresample.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> > > > > > libavutil/opt.h | 3 +++
> > > > > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm fine with this, but the patch is incomplete:
> > > > > libavfilter/x86/vf_spp.c also uses av_get_int.
> > > > > Furthermore the FF_OPT_TYPE_* defines are used in several places.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes I noticed the last one in vf_spp.c, I missed it (don't know how),
> > > have
> > > > it locally amended. I'm working on FF_OPT_TYPE_* separately (I'm
> doing
> > > one
> > > > deprecation macro at a time).
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Some really are a mess, Michael can you comment on how on earth you
> could
> > > > consider adding av_stream_get_end_pts as a replacement for AVFrac
> without
> > > > deeply frowning at yourself? Can you take some time and fix that
> > > correctly?
> > >
> > > AVFrac is used to exactly compute timestamps
> >
> >
> > I know what it does.
> >
> > I'm talking about a developer's decision to take a deprecated field,
> leave
> > it actively deprecated and about to be removed and then add a public that
> > uses exactly this API. How could you do that? How does that in any way
> help
> > us deprecate the struct or field? AVStream.pts is still marked as
> > deprecated and isn't even hidden from the public API in your supposedly
> > "fixed" implementation. Its API is still exposed in the place where you
> put
> > the data. It still doesn't compile after the version bump. In other
> words,
> > your patch didn't solve anything.
> >
>
> > Can you please fix it properly? Properly means that after bump, it
> compiles
> > and passes fate.
>
> > I'd almost suggest we set up a fate station that tests
> > that for the next version bump.
>
> no objection but i think first the code should pass fate after a bump
> before such a fate machine is added
>
>
> > If we intend to hide AVFrac from the user,
> > this probably means renaming AVFrac to just Frac, and moving it into some
> > internal-only data structure not exposed to the user, where it's
> accessible
> > for av_stream_get_end_pts to use.
>
> the AVFrac pts field is in AVStream
> internal AVStream fields are simply after the comment:
> /*****************************************************************
> * All fields below this line are not part of the public API. They
> * may not be used outside of libavformat and can be changed and
> * removed at will.
> * New public fields should be added right above.
> *****************************************************************
> */
>
> I can move the field after that with appropriate #if, if that
> resolves the issue
How do we enforce this btw? Isn't it much nicer (since we allocate AVStream
inside lavf anyway) if we hide all the items and make them
internally-visible only in a separate struct (typedef struct AVStreamReal {
AVStream parent; [ all other members ] } AVStreamReal;)?
(I bet that mplayer or some other half-assed project uses one of these
members and will complain.)
Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
