On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:48:07AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Michael Niedermayer <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 05:45:55PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 16.08.2015 22:15, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > > > Convert last users to av_opt_get_*() counterparts. > > > > > --- > > > > > libavfilter/af_aresample.c | 17 +++++++++-------- > > > > > libavutil/opt.h | 3 +++ > > > > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > I'm fine with this, but the patch is incomplete: > > > > libavfilter/x86/vf_spp.c also uses av_get_int. > > > > Furthermore the FF_OPT_TYPE_* defines are used in several places. > > > > > > > > > Yes I noticed the last one in vf_spp.c, I missed it (don't know how), > > have > > > it locally amended. I'm working on FF_OPT_TYPE_* separately (I'm doing > > one > > > deprecation macro at a time). > > > > > > > > Some really are a mess, Michael can you comment on how on earth you could > > > consider adding av_stream_get_end_pts as a replacement for AVFrac without > > > deeply frowning at yourself? Can you take some time and fix that > > correctly? > > > > AVFrac is used to exactly compute timestamps > > > I know what it does. > > I'm talking about a developer's decision to take a deprecated field, leave > it actively deprecated and about to be removed and then add a public that > uses exactly this API. How could you do that? How does that in any way help > us deprecate the struct or field? AVStream.pts is still marked as > deprecated and isn't even hidden from the public API in your supposedly > "fixed" implementation. Its API is still exposed in the place where you put > the data. It still doesn't compile after the version bump. In other words, > your patch didn't solve anything. >
> Can you please fix it properly? Properly means that after bump, it compiles
> and passes fate.
> I'd almost suggest we set up a fate station that tests
> that for the next version bump.
no objection but i think first the code should pass fate after a bump
before such a fate machine is added
> If we intend to hide AVFrac from the user,
> this probably means renaming AVFrac to just Frac, and moving it into some
> internal-only data structure not exposed to the user, where it's accessible
> for av_stream_get_end_pts to use.
the AVFrac pts field is in AVStream
internal AVStream fields are simply after the comment:
/*****************************************************************
* All fields below this line are not part of the public API. They
* may not be used outside of libavformat and can be changed and
* removed at will.
* New public fields should be added right above.
*****************************************************************
*/
I can move the field after that with appropriate #if, if that
resolves the issue
the AVFrac struct would have to remain in the public header under some
name though or would need to be dynamically allocated
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
DNS cache poisoning attacks, popular search engine, Google internet authority
dont be evil, please
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
