On 9 Oct 2024, at 22:15, Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> On 2024-10-03 04:04 +0200, Lynne via ffmpeg-devel wrote: >> On 01/10/2024 15:24, vipyne wrote: >>> --- >>> configure | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/configure b/configure >>> index c8fb49a7a4..d178ef59dc 100755 >>> --- a/configure >>> +++ b/configure >>> @@ -6460,7 +6460,7 @@ EOF >>> for program in $x86asmexe nasm yasm; do >>> probe_x86asm $program && break >>> done >>> - disabled x86asm && die "nasm/yasm not found or too old. Use >>> --disable-x86asm for a crippled build." >>> + disabled x86asm && die "nasm/yasm not found or too old. Please >>> install/update nasm or yasm or use --disable-x86asm for a slower build." >>> X86ASMFLAGS="-f $objformat" >>> test -n "$extern_prefix" && append X86ASMFLAGS "-DPREFIX" >>> case "$objformat" in >> >> Could you remove the yasm mention? Its been holding us back and we've >> discussed dropping support for it enough in recent time to go ahead and do >> it any day now. >> Otherwise LGTM. > > No opinion on yasm, but IMHO the new wording proposal regarding the > build is a little bit ambigous. > > What do you think about the following? > > ...use --disable-x86asm for a build without hand-optimized assembly. > > I would hope it's clearer and more precise. > +1 from me, as „slower build“ could be understood as the process of building FFmpeg will be slower. > > Best regards, > Alexander > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
