On 2024-10-03 04:04 +0200, Lynne via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> On 01/10/2024 15:24, vipyne wrote:
> > ---
> > configure | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/configure b/configure
> > index c8fb49a7a4..d178ef59dc 100755
> > --- a/configure
> > +++ b/configure
> > @@ -6460,7 +6460,7 @@ EOF
> > for program in $x86asmexe nasm yasm; do
> > probe_x86asm $program && break
> > done
> > - disabled x86asm && die "nasm/yasm not found or too old. Use
> > --disable-x86asm for a crippled build."
> > + disabled x86asm && die "nasm/yasm not found or too old. Please
> > install/update nasm or yasm or use --disable-x86asm for a slower build."
> > X86ASMFLAGS="-f $objformat"
> > test -n "$extern_prefix" && append X86ASMFLAGS "-DPREFIX"
> > case "$objformat" in
>
> Could you remove the yasm mention? Its been holding us back and we've
> discussed dropping support for it enough in recent time to go ahead and do
> it any day now.
> Otherwise LGTM.
No opinion on yasm, but IMHO the new wording proposal regarding the
build is a little bit ambigous.
What do you think about the following?
...use --disable-x86asm for a build without hand-optimized assembly.
I would hope it's clearer and more precise.
Best regards,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
