Were there any more comments on this patch? Thanks! - dale
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 12:19 PM Dale Curtis <dalecur...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 12:25 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 8/17/2024 3:04 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> > >> > >> 20978/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_H264_fuzzer-5746381832847360 >> sent privately >> > > Thanks for the sample Michael. I've confirmed it does not reproduce > with my change when the checked bitstream reader is used -- and does > reproduce with small_pad=true and the unchecked bitstream reader. > > >> > >> > thx >> >> Could the padding be changed to AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE instead of >> 0 when small_padding is requested? >> > > Either 0 or AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE works with the checked bitstream > reader. AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE isn't sufficient to fix the fuzzer > test case when small_pad=true and the unchecked bitstream reader is used > though. > > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >> > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
