On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 12:25 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/17/2024 3:04 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > > 20978/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_H264_fuzzer-5746381832847360 > sent privately > Thanks for the sample Michael. I've confirmed it does not reproduce with my change when the checked bitstream reader is used -- and does reproduce with small_pad=true and the unchecked bitstream reader. > > > > thx > > Could the padding be changed to AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE instead of > 0 when small_padding is requested? > Either 0 or AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE works with the checked bitstream reader. AV_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE isn't sufficient to fix the fuzzer test case when small_pad=true and the unchecked bitstream reader is used though. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
