On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 9:01 PM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12024-06-17): > > also if you look at google trends, even today more people search for > ffserver > > than txproto. In fact at every point in time more people searched for > ffserver > > than txproto. > > > > https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=txproto,ffserver > > > > So even though ffserver is dead, removed and unmaintained, it has more > > users > > > > And this comes back to what i said many times. We should use the name > > FFmpeg, our domain and NOT push every bit of new inovation out into > > sub projects. > > > > We should put a newly developed ffserver into the main ffmpeg git. > > We should put wasm build support into the main ffmpeg git. > > We should turn ffplay into a fully competetive player. > > ... > > Hear! Hear! > > I would add, as general guiding principles: > > We should provide both low- and high-level APIs. Ideally, the fftools > should be just user interface around the high-level APIs provided by the > libraries. Patches welcome? Not that it means anything, but you had exactly 2 lines on ffserver before it got removed, so I wonder who exactly you think should be maintaining all that cruft code (honest question, if you have a real plan for solving this ageless problem I think many people on the ML would be interested) -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
