On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 09:04:34AM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > > Le 6 mai 2024 04:23:07 GMT+03:00, Michael Niedermayer > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> a écrit : > >Fixes: CID1439574 Dereference after null check > > If SPS is guaranteed to be non-NULL, there should probably be an assertion to > document it, and it should be *before* that alleged dereference (which is not > visible in the patch context).
why ? I mean why would sps require an assert*(sps) but the overwhelming majority of pointers, we just dereference without assert before them ? thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
