On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 09:04:34AM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 6 mai 2024 04:23:07 GMT+03:00, Michael Niedermayer 
> <mich...@niedermayer.cc> a écrit :
> >Fixes: CID1439574 Dereference after null check
> 
> If SPS is guaranteed to be non-NULL, there should probably be an assertion to 
> document it, and it should be *before* that alleged dereference (which is not 
> visible in the patch context).

why ?

I mean why would sps require an assert*(sps) but the overwhelming majority
of pointers, we just dereference without assert before them ?

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to