Le 6 mai 2024 04:23:07 GMT+03:00, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> a écrit : >Fixes: CID1439574 Dereference after null check
If SPS is guaranteed to be non-NULL, there should probably be an assertion to document it, and it should be *before* that alleged dereference (which is not visible in the patch context). > >Sponsored-by: Sovereign Tech Fund >Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> >--- > libavcodec/h264_slice.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c >index 90d37f60848..ce2c4caca1b 100644 >--- a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c >+++ b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c >@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static int h264_field_start(H264Context *h, const >H264SliceContext *sl, > > sps = h->ps.sps; > >- if (sps && sps->bitstream_restriction_flag && >+ if (sps->bitstream_restriction_flag && > h->avctx->has_b_frames < sps->num_reorder_frames) { > h->avctx->has_b_frames = sps->num_reorder_frames; > } _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".