On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 12:31 AM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/19/2024 7:28 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:58 PM Vittorio Giovara < > > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:48 PM Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 2:06 PM Vittorio Giovara < > >>> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:00 AM Diederick C. Niehorster < > >>>> dcni...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> If i recall correctly, there was a conversation not too long ago > >> about > >>>> what > >>>>> to do with all the SPI money. This seems to be a perfect use for it. > >>>>> 1. Set up and manage a gitlab instance > >>>>> 2. Move tickets from trac to there (possibly) > >>>>> 3. Move fate running to there > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Another good idea would be to show negative influences the door, and > >> not > >>>> being afraid to ban them when needed. > >>>> Currently the CC is supposed to decide that but idk how many and which > >>>> people have access to the mailing list control panel. > >>>> > >>> > >>> The CC does not have authority to permanently ban people. See ( > >>> https://ffmpeg.org/community.html#Community-Committee-1): "The CC can > >>> remove privileges of offending members, including [..] temporary ban > from > >>> the community. [..] Indefinite bans from the community must be > confirmed > >> by > >>> the General Assembly, in a majority vote." > >>> > >>> Enough of us have access to the ML admin interface to assume this will > >> not > >>> be an issue. > >>> > >> > >> Thanks for the clarification, it's good to know. So correct me if I'm > >> wrong, the theoretical banning process is that a repeated offender is > >> reported enough times, the CC notices that the temporary bans have had > no > >> effects and decides to invoke the GA to confirm a ban? > >> > > > > By that time, if not already, GA will be majority of active bots or > > majority of active controlled figures. > > What bots? That makes no sense. > Current situation in FFmpeg makes no sense. Could someone explain current FFmpeg situation? > > > > > So in that hypothetical case, (I hope it does not happen), 0 transparency > > and 0 innovations, > > with questionable commits and contributors will remain in project, if not > > already happening. > > > > Its 2024 year, and FFmpeg still does not have proper subtitle support. > > I could continue writing and adding more to the list, but I'm very > generous > > today. > > > > > >> -- > >> Vittorio > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list > >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > >> > >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > >> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
