Frank Plowman:
> On 15/03/2024 10:22, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, 22:54 Michael Niedermayer, <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 10:55:18PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 22:06, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:13 PM Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> $subj
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As discussed at FOSDEM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Author of this patch above is forced to FUZZ this decoder until
>>>>> experimental flag is removed.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure, I will set some fuzzers up over the weekend.
>>>
>>> over a month later ...
>>> has this been done ?
>>>
>>>
>>> thx
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>
>> Frank said there was no need as he was doing it himself.
>>
>> I do not appreciate your passive aggressive tone.
>>
>> Kieran
>>
> 
> I have been fuzzing since the end of January.  Various patches have made
> the decoder much more robust than it was then.  Still getting a crash on
> occasion, but most are now false positives due to assertion failures
> rather than segmentation faults or other potential security issues.
> That being said, the hardware I am using is extremely modest compared to
> oss-fuzz's.

An assertion failure is not a false positive. Even if it is an av_assert2.

- Andreas

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to