On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 06:01, Nuo Mi <nuomi2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 6:55 AM Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 22:06, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:13 PM Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote: > > > > > > > $subj > > > > > > > > As discussed at FOSDEM. > > > > > > > > > > Author of this patch above is forced to FUZZ this decoder until > > > experimental flag is removed. > > > > > > > Sure, I will set some fuzzers up over the weekend. > > > Better add something here > https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#New-codecs-or-formats-checklist to > explain to people what kind of new codecs should be treated as experimental > and how they can graduate from experimental status. >
Hi Nuo, Sure, this isn't saying your incredible work is bad. It's just the reality that a complex codec needs to be fuzzed heavily otherwise the security community will report FFmpeg 7.0 has a ton of security issues. Regards, Kieran Kunhya _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
