On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:42:02AM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 1:46 AM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > wrote: > > > > Again, the effective way to work-around this problem is to keep a large > > and > > > diverse enough TC membership to offset the one or few hypothetical > > dishonest > > > votes. > > > > This doesnt work. The set of people is very specific, and they will always > > be > > representatives of the community so when 60% of the community works for > > companies which would benefit by FFmpeg not competing. There > > would be no realistic way to have a committee that wasnt also 60% affected > > by this. And for this we need a clear rule. > > > > This scenario is, also, not realistic.
that may or may not be, but rules cannot be applied at the discretion of the person who has a conflicting interrest against FFmpeg thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No human being will ever know the Truth, for even if they happen to say it by chance, they would not even known they had done so. -- Xenophanes
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
