On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 1:46 AM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > Again, the effective way to work-around this problem is to keep a large > and > > diverse enough TC membership to offset the one or few hypothetical > dishonest > > votes. > > This doesnt work. The set of people is very specific, and they will always > be > representatives of the community so when 60% of the community works for > companies which would benefit by FFmpeg not competing. There > would be no realistic way to have a committee that wasnt also 60% affected > by this. And for this we need a clear rule. > This scenario is, also, not realistic. -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
