Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-02-23 15:00:24) > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:22:57AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Hi, > > in the 'avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding' thread it became > > apparent that there is wide disagreement about the interpretation of > > this line in the TC rules: > > > > > If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should > > > recuse themselves from the decision. > > > > The word 'involves' in it can be intepreted a variety of very different > > ways, to apply to TC members who e.g.: > > 1) authored the changes that are being objected to > > 2) are objecting to the changes > > 3) have any opinion on the changes, either positive or negative > > 4) have previously voiced an opinion that would apply to the changes > > 5) authored the code that is being modified > > 6) have a financial or other similar interest in a specific outcome of > > the disagreement > > > > I believe the best way to address this is to make the rule more > > explicit, so I propose that people with an opinion on the matter submit > > their preferred wording, and then we can have the GA vote on it. > > For the actual vote about changing the rules and the discussion of it. > Each option should provide a patch. > Otherwise you could have a whole new discussion after the vote how > to turn it into a change to the rules
My proposal is an excerpt from a patch, just trimmed down to make it easier to read. And I don't see what could be ambiguous about it, you just remove one specific line and replace it with other text as proposed. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
