On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-02-20 15:01:11) > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:22:57AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > [...] > > > their preferred wording, and then we can have the GA vote on it. > > > > Before this GA vote, we need another extra member discussion/vote. > > Because the last GA reset droped several developers from the GA > > I see neither why would we "need" such a vote, or why should it be > related to this one.
Because thats what was done in the past. The extra member vote was done between a GA reset and the following votes like the CC/TC votes The exception was the STF vote because there just was not enough time We should do this consistently, and given that we reset the GA every 6 months, thats the natural rate at which to do a extra member vote (unless there is no other vote then the extra member vote can be skiped as it would make no difference) thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Nations do behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives. -- Abba Eban
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
