> On Feb 21, 2024, at 09:39, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <j...@videolan.org> wrote: > > Yo, > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, at 15:31, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> I did hear (at fosdem?) >> about the idea to switch from rsync to git for managing the fate samples >> i thought the idea sounds interresting but isnt rsync more efficient ? > > Yes, that's my idea. > > The git part is not for others clients to sync, but just to manage the > samples.
I use git and git-lfs to manage/sync ffmpeg-fate-sample. It’s easy to setup a mirror repo to avoid a lot of network issues at some countries. > > It allows to have versioning of the samples, with the extra ability to have > branches and tags matching the ffmpeg branches. > It avoids the weird dance "waiting for FATE admin to upload thing", because > their would be multiple approvers/committers to that repo. > It simplifies the workflow on the admin side, since with a git hook, the > server does "git update" in the directory that will be rsync'd by the > mirrors. And it does not change their workflow, still using rsync. > > just my 5c. > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President > +33 672 704 734 > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
