On 12/15/23 16:31, Zsolt Vadász via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
On Friday, December 15th, 2023 at 10:12 PM, Leo Izen <leo.i...@gmail.com> wrote:


On 12/15/23 11:40, Zsolt Vadász via ffmpeg-devel wrote:

On Friday, December 15th, 2023 at 12:20 AM, Leo Izen leo.i...@gmail.com wrote:

+ AVFrame *last;

I don't see the purpose of keeping this here.

The name is misleading, I should have named it `previous`, since it always 
contains the previous frame.
I did it this way so I could call JxlEncoderCloseInput when the callback 
received NULL.


This isn't needed to call JxlEncoderCloseInput, as it takes one
argument, which is JxlEncoder *.

Indeed, but according to the docs[0]:
"If the last frame or last box has been added, JxlEncoderCloseInput, 
JxlEncoderCloseFrames
and/or JxlEncoderCloseBoxes must be called before the next 
JxlEncoderProcessOutput call,
or the codestream won’t be encoded correctly."
When the encoder eventually receives NULL, there isn't anything left to add, 
unless I store the previous frame,
is there?

You can always call JxlEncoderProcessOutput at the start of the loop, rather than calling it after JxlEncoderAddImageFrame. (Except perhaps the first loop.)

If you do this, you'll process the frame that was added last loop, and then you can add another frame. If you receive NULL, you call JxlEncoderCloseInput at the start of the loop, before you call JxlEncoderProcessOutput. This saves you from having to store the AVFrame in memory. libjxl will have a copy of it in memory anyway for reference purposes so this allows us to reduce memory usage.


+
+ if(!ctx->last && !avctx->internal->draining) { > + ctx->last = 
av_frame_clone(frame);
+ *got_packet = 0;
+ return AVERROR(EAGAIN);

It looks like you're trying to emit one packet per image, rather than
one packet per encoded frame. This is fine, but you should not be
calling av_frame_clone, and there's no reason to use
avctx->internal->draining here. If you are doing this, you also have no
reason to cache ctx->last at all.

It's the opposite, I'm trying to emit a packet for each frame of the animation.


Libjxl provides no promise of doing this meaningfully, by the way. You
may end up with arbitrary subdivisions, not subdivisions on frame
boundaries.

Well that's one thing I didn't account for, a real pity. Do you recommend 
emitting a
single packet instead?

You can still accomplish what you're trying to do with libjxl but you need to finesse it a little bit. You need to (1) disable the container format, as its interaction with Frames is undefined, and you need to (2) loop calls to JxlEncoderProcessOutput until it returns JXL_ENC_SUCCESS.

The docs specify "This encodes the frames and/or boxes added so far" so it will end up flushing out the remaining frames if the container format is disabled.


+const FFCodec ff_libjxl_animated_encoder = {
+ .p.name = "libjxl_animated",
+ CODEC_LONG_NAME("libjxl Animated JPEG XL"),
+ .p.type = AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO,
+ .p.id = AV_CODEC_ID_JPEGXL,
+ .priv_data_size = sizeof(LibJxlEncodeContext),
+ .init = libjxl_animated_encode_init,
+ FF_CODEC_ENCODE_CB(libjxl_animated_encode_frame),
+ .close = libjxl_encode_close,
+ .p.capabilities = AV_CODEC_CAP_OTHER_THREADS |
+ AV_CODEC_CAP_ENCODER_REORDERED_OPAQUE |
+ AV_CODEC_CAP_DELAY,
+ .caps_internal = FF_CODEC_CAP_NOT_INIT_THREADSAFE |
+ FF_CODEC_CAP_AUTO_THREADS | FF_CODEC_CAP_INIT_CLEANUP |
+ FF_CODEC_CAP_ICC_PROFILES | FF_CODEC_CAP_EOF_FLUSH,

Why FF_CODEC_CAP_EOF_FLUSH?

So the encoder receives a NULL after the last frame has been submitted,
so JxlEncoderCloseInput can be called and the final frame properly emitted.


Ah, that makes sense, thanks.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

[0] 
https://libjxl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api_encoder.html#_CPPv423JxlEncoderProcessOutputP10JxlEncoderPP7uint8_tP6size_t
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to