Quoting Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel (2023-12-06 21:29:11)
> There is still a penalty as you could do asetnsamples without multi-threading 
> and get even higher performance,
> but given the general benefits of multi-threading and the fact that it's 
> possible to increase the performance of this 
> usecase arbitrarily by using larger and larger frames I think that's an 
> acceptable tradeoff for this use case.

Exactly, I don't think you can reasonably expect a generic transcoder to
be optimally performant in all cases. Every major change like this is a
tradeoff and we have to pick those that are most broadly useful.
A transcoding setup that encodes PCM and throws it away is not
particularly useful, and the picture could change quite a lot once you
add actual encoding.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to