On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:14 PM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Lie. > A summary of your proposal or a link to your suggestion would be appreciated. Without reference we're all shouting in the void. > I guess now that your side holds most of the power the mask is off. > > This mail you just sent should be enough to get you kicked out three > times over. > I actually chuckled at this line :-D But that will not happen, will it? > > Congratulations, you are on track to become FFmpeg's de-facto dictator, > just like you were libav's de-facto dictator and ran it to the ground > with your blatant disregard for users and disrespect for fellow > developers. > I don't think improving the ffmpeg CLI tools shows any "disregard for users" and having code in parallel shows a lot of respect to fellow developers since it makes our life easier. You seem fixed on a crusade of keeping the status quo, but the consensus you speak of is instead to move forward. Yes some very minor use cases might break or see degraded performance, but that's the point of a development branch - so that we can all improve the code before the next stable release > I hope Fabrice keeps control of the domain, so that we can revive FFmpeg > in a few years. > See? this is what i mean, you're still in 2011. It's time to move on Nicolas, for your own sake, and for respect to your fellow developers and the users you hold so dear -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
