Hi Paul On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 11:27, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:38 AM Clément Péron <peron.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 09:58, Andreas Rheinhardt > > <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > Clément Péron: > > > > Hi Michael, Andreas, > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 22:50, Andreas Rheinhardt > > > > <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Michael Niedermayer: > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 02:17:00PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > > > >>>> Output the producer reference time to a dirty raw output. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.c...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> --- > > > >>>> libavformat/rawenc.c | 122 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > >>>> 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+) > > > >>> > > > >>> this breaks fate-filter-volume and others > > > >>> (Segmentation fault) > > > >>> > > > >>> I can rerun it with debug symbols and provide peoper gdb output > > > >>> but i suspect given this has "HACK" in the title you are aware of > > this > > > > > > > > The "HACK" tag meaning was not supposed to be: "it's ok if it > > > > segfaults", but more to trigger a discussion is it possible to > > > > properly support an output timestamp in the raw video demux, and if > > > > yes how to do it :) > > > > > > If you need a timestamp for raw video, then use a proper container and > > > not raw video. In fact, this patch basically creates new formats > > > different from all the raw formats. > > > > Yes I agree, but I do not want to add too much overhead nor > > computation processing or memory copy to my pipeline just to mux and > > demux between ffmpeg and my python script. > > > > The idea is to have a very light structure to easily pipe it. > > > > I'm not familiar with audio/video container but it seems to me that > > parsing containers are not very light no? > > > > > Containers range from almost no processing like .y4m to complex monsters > like .mxf
.y4m doesn't contain a timestamp either, and I don't want to use a complex container :), > > This patch is hack and approach/solution it tries is flawed. 100% agree with you that's why I prefix the patch with "HACK:", Regards, Clement > > > > Thanks, > > Clement > > > > > > > > > > - Andreas > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > > > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > > _______________________________________________ > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
