Derek Buitenhuis (12022-12-09): > My intent was to rename in case we ever got an actual IPFS implementation, > but I have no strong opinion on whether to keep this part of the patch or > not.
Even if we do, the names are local, they do not conflict. > My personal preference is verbosity here, but it's not a strong preference. I do not insist on this. Maybe verbosity is best. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
