Also use the frame pixel format instead of the one from the codec
context, which is more robust.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
---
 libavcodec/h264_slice.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c
index 0c0812f..0183b9c 100644
--- a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c
+++ b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c
@@ -1552,12 +1552,14 @@ int ff_h264_decode_slice_header(H264Context *h, 
H264SliceContext *sl)
              * vectors.  Given we are concealing a lost frame, this probably
              * is not noticeable by comparison, but it should be fixed. */
             if (h->short_ref_count) {
-                if (prev) {
+                if (prev && h->short_ref[0]->f->width == prev->f->width
+                    && h->short_ref[0]->f->height == prev->f->height
+                    && h->short_ref[0]->f->format == prev->f->format) {
                     av_image_copy(h->short_ref[0]->f->data,
                                   h->short_ref[0]->f->linesize,
                                   (const uint8_t **)prev->f->data,
                                   prev->f->linesize,
-                                  h->avctx->pix_fmt,
+                                  prev->f->format,
                                   h->mb_width  * 16,
                                   h->mb_height * 16);
                     h->short_ref[0]->poc = prev->poc + 2;
-- 
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to